Legal Opinion

Vincent U. Williams v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2016No. WD79001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cynthia L. Martin, Judge .

-Vincent U. Williams (“Williams”) appeals following the motion court’s denial of his pro se Rule- 24.035 motion; without an evidentiary hearing. Williams alleges that his post-conviction counsel was unlawfully permitted to withdraw from his representation, leaving him without the benefit of counsel. We agree with Williams, and reverse and vacate the judgment denying his pro se Rule 24.035 motion, and remand this matter to the motion court for further proceedings.

Factual and Procedural Background

Williams pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated as a chronic…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State v. HornbuckleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott M. Bishop v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Drew Ryland v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. ERIC JERONE WILLIAMS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Kevin D. Posch v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API