Legal Opinion
Lichtman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 3, 1997PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County (Meehan, J.), dated April 1, 1996, which denied their motion for leave to enter a default judgment based upon the failure of the defendant Sears Roebuck & Company to timely answer the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiffs allegedly served the defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company (hereinafter Sears) on August 8, 1995, by personal delivery of the summons and complaint upon a "security agent” in one of its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davies v. Contel of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Richard Kranis, P. C. v. European American BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Meyer v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Walter v. Rockland Armor & Metal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bunch v. Dollar Budget, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Harris v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Birky v. KatsilogiannisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- D & W Construction v. IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Whitfield v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.