Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered December 18, 1989, which denied plaintiff’s motion for an order granting a default judgment with leave to reapply if defendant fails to serve a verified answer within 10 days, is unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff and defendant are officers, directors, and shareholders of Sloan’s Supermarket. Pursuant to an agreement with Sloan’s Supermarket, plaintiff agreed to leave active management, and thereafter he was to receive cash remuneration. Plaintiff commenced this action when defendant terminated his remuneration.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lichtman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Higgins v. Bellet Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Johnson v. Marriott Management Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Bergida v. WassenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Harley v. HawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API