Legal Opinion
Richard Kranis, P. C. v. European American Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 31, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), dated June 14,1993, which granted the defendant’s motion for an extension of time to serve its answer and denied the plaintiffs’ cross motion for a default judgment.
*905Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion for an extension of time to serve an answer pursuant to CPLR 2004 (see, Salzman & Salzman v Gardiner, 100 AD2d 846). Since the defendant’s motion was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buderwitz v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Salzman & Salzman v. GardinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lichtman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Whitfield v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Goldman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Vollaro v. BevilacquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Piccirillo v. Scarlino Fuel Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.