Legal Opinion
City of Ashland v. Kittle
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 23, 1961PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Judge.
This action was instituted in the Boyd Circuit Court by City of Ashland to condemn certain improved real estate for use in connection with the expansion of its municipal water system. At a trial before a jury Barger Kittle and Verna Kittle, his wife, the owners of the fee, were awarded $25,000. David W. Phipps and Ann P. Phipps, his wife, and William H. Culbertson and Imogene Culbertson, his wife, the owners of a leasehold interest in the property, were given $20,000 as damages.
The city has appealed, and its chief ground for reversal is that the lower court erred when it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Matter of City of New York (Upper N.Y. Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Cornell-Andrews Smelting Co. v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. New Jersey Zinc Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Corp. v. DoernhoeferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Kaiser Development Co. v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1986
- Spokane School District No. 81 v. ParzybokWashington Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.