Rudnick v. Rudnick
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEVY, Acting P. J.
Appellants, Philip Rudnick, Robert Rudnick, and Milton Rudnick, are three of the beneficiaries of the Rudnick Estates Trust (RET) and hold a minority interest. Respondent, Oscar Rudnick, is the trustee of the RET. After the majority of the RET beneficiaries approved the sale of the RET’s principal asset, the Onyx Ranch, respondent petitioned the probate court for instructions requesting approval of both the sale and the proposed distribution. Appellants opposed this petition.
The probate court concluded that appellants’ opposition was primarily for the purpose of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Estate of ReadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Hollaway v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pizarro v. ReynosoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Sino Century Development Ltd. v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In re Mashburn Marital TrustsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Powell v. Tagami, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Pizarro v. Reynoso, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.