Legal Opinion

Singer-Fleischaker Royalty Co. v. Whisenhunt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 22, 1964No. 40323PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Singer-Fleischaker Royalty Company, successor to Provident Royalties Corpora tion, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced proceedings against defendants in error, referred to as defendants, to quiet title to an undivided one-half interest in the minerals under a 120 acre tract of land in Beaver County, Oklahoma, and for other relief in connection therewith. In such proceeding plaintiff sought to invoke the equitable doctrine of estoppel by deed and asserted its title by virtue of Title 16 O.S. 1961, § 17.

The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrers to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rooney v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Sawyer v. BahnsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Equitable Royalty Corp. v. HulletSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Nutt v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Crews Lumber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Kenyon Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Wood v. SympsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Campbell v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. BUTTERFIELD v. TRUSTEE OF MCCOY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUSTCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API