Legal Opinion

Wilhelmus v. Geren

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 13, 2011No. Civil Action 09-662 (JEB)PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff Neil Wilhelmus was a cadet at the United States Military Academy. He struggled throughout his time there with the mandatory Cadet Physical Fitness Test and was eventually disenrolled because of his repeated failures on this test. After being separated from the Academy, the Army determined that he owed the government $137,630 for failing to fulfill his contractual obligations. He appealed to the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), which upheld the Army’s decision. He now turns to this Court. Because the ABCMR…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Grace v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Remmie v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Bates v. DonleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Does 1-72 v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. Saint-Fleur v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API