Legal Opinion

Irion v. Hyde

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1940No. 8,013PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Johnson

This is an appeal from an amended judgment rendered pursuant to new findings of fact and conclusions of law made after the cause had been here on a prior appeal and had been remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

In 1937 plaintiffs sought to enjoin defendants from maintaining dams alleged to interfere with plaintiffs’ prior water rights on Sheep Creek. In their answer and cross-complaint defendants claimed a water right superior to plaintiffs’ to the extent of 1,500 miner’s inches on the creek and two of its tributaries, by adverse user and by plaintiff’s abandonment, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. . MillikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. State v. MegordenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Northwest States Utilities Co. v. BrouiletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Copenhaver v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Gallatin v. Corning Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Teton Prairie LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Nesbitt v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. HallamMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Jangula v. United States Rubber CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Tingwall v. King Hill Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API