Legal Opinion
Gill v. . Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 7, 1912PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, C. J., and BROWN, J., dissenting. This action was brought by the plaintiffs to test the validity of an election held in Wake Forest for the purpose of establishing a school district therein and levying a special tax for the support of the same, under Revisal, sec. 4115, which was amended by the Public Laws of 1909, ch. 525, and Public Laws of 1911, ch. 135, sec. 1. It provides that "Special school tax districts may be formed by the county board of education in any county without regard to township lines under the following conditions: Upon a petition of one-fourth of the freeholders…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- City of New York v. New York City Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Lake County v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Harshman v. Bates CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Smith v. BryanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Whittemore v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Watkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- MacPherson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.