Legal Opinion
Floyd v. Morristown European Motors, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 26, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
138 N.J. Super. 588 (1976)
351 A.2d 791
MICHAEL V.C. FLOYD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MORRISTOWN EUROPEAN MOTORS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 10, 1975.
Decided January 26, 1976.
Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.
Mr. Edward J. Gilhooly argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Yauch, Peterpaul & Clark, attorneys).
Mr. Pieter J. de Jong argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, P.J.A.D.
Defendant, an automobile dealer appeals from a judgment in a nonjury trial favoring plaintiff, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Heuvelman v. Triplett Electrical Instrument Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Weick v. Rickenbaugh Cadillac CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Bayer v. Oxford University Press, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilfred J. Wakefield v. Northern Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Vanguard Telecommunications, Inc. v. Southern New England Telephone Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Kvaerner Process v. Barham-McBrideNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Wilfred J. Wakefield v. Northern Telecom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985