Legal Opinion

Bayer v. Oxford University Press, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 18, 1946PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.

The defendant is engaged mainly in the publication of bibles, textbooks, dictionaries and other types of books with the exception of fiction. The plaintiff entered the employ of the defendant back in August, 1901, and continued until he resigned on December 31, 1943, a period of upwards of forty-two years. He was principally engaged in selling defendant’s bibles. In the performance of his work, among other things, he originated special styles of bindings which were adopted by the defendant.

We are not concerned here with the moneys he earned in the early days. However, in 1940 the basis upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dibble v. . DimickNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. McCaskey v. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. McClaskey v. . Cumberland Glass Manufacturing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hall v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Weiner v. Diebold Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Bader v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Zolotar v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Grattan v. Societa Per Azzioni Cotonficio CantoniNew York Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API