Legal Opinion

State v. Salzman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 27, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

228 N.J. Super. 109 (1987)

549 A.2d 46

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ERIC SALZMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 28, 1987.

Decided October 27, 1987.

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and O'BRIEN.

Eric Salzman argued the cause pro se.

John Caruso, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Joseph C. Dickson, Jr., Township Attorney, attorney; Robert A. Hoonhout, Assistant Township Attorney, on the letter brief).

2Per curiam

The problem presented in this appeal is whether convictions based on improper complaints in municipal court proceedings for violating…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. State v. CzachorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. State v. WeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. State v. Del FinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. State v. WagnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FrostSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. State v. FisherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. State v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. State v. KenisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API