State v. Wein
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Handler, J.
The Court is called upon in this appeal to determine the sufficiency of an indictment charging the defendants Howard Wein and Philip Guarino, with the substantive crime of selling and distributing obscene motion picture films contrary to N.J.8.A. 2A:115-2 and with conspiracy to commit these criminal violations. The narrow issue presented is whether the count of the indictment charging defendants with the substantive crime under the obscenity statute is fatally defective for its failure to recite as an essential element of the offense…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- State v. FortinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- State v. EngelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.