Legal Opinion

State v. Wein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 19, 1979PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Handler, J.

The Court is called upon in this appeal to determine the sufficiency of an indictment charging the defendants Howard Wein and Philip Guarino, with the substantive crime of selling and distributing obscene motion picture films contrary to N.J.8.A. 2A:115-2 and with conspiracy to commit these criminal violations. The narrow issue presented is whether the count of the indictment charging defendants with the substantive crime under the obscenity statute is fatally defective for its failure to recite as an essential element of the offense…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. HoganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. State v. FortinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. State v. EngelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API