Porter v. Warner-Caldwell Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This case turns upon the construction of certain clauses of reservation and exception in deeds involving producing oil lands. Roy Porter, as plaintiff, brought the action to quiet his title to a number of oil wells on the premises. A demurrer to his evidence was sustained by the trial court.
Porter claimed under a chain of three deeds. The deed directly to him was from William S. Brock and wife. In the habendum clause is this language: “except oil and gas lease on the premises and reservation of record of oil and gas royalties.” It seems clear that, if his grantors had title, Porter acquired…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Wilson v. OlsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Edwards v. BrushaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- White v. WesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Jarrett v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Whitman v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Askins v. British-American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Rose v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Bascom v. MaxeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.