Legal Opinion

Hallock v. Income Guaranty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1935No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 38,067PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

On November 25, 1930, G. Edson Hallock, plaintiff, an attorney at Pontiac, Michigan, took out a combination health and accident insurance policy with Income Guaranty Company, defendant. The policy provided for indemnity at the rate of $100 per moxxth for the period of continuous total disability, resulting from bodily disease, during which the insured should be xxecessarily and continuously confined within the house, and for a lesser amount for the period of continuous total disability during which the insured should not be necessarily confined withixx the house. Notwithstanding the fact that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Kangas v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Paul v. University Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mondou v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Roberts v. LundyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ebert v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API