Hallock v. Income Guaranty Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.
On November 25, 1930, G. Edson Hallock, plaintiff, an attorney at Pontiac, Michigan, took out a combination health and accident insurance policy with Income Guaranty Company, defendant. The policy provided for indemnity at the rate of $100 per moxxth for the period of continuous total disability, resulting from bodily disease, during which the insured should be xxecessarily and continuously confined within the house, and for a lesser amount for the period of continuous total disability during which the insured should not be necessarily confined withixx the house. Notwithstanding the fact that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Kangas v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Paul v. University Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Mondou v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Roberts v. LundyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Ebert v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.