State v. Sterling
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge. *
After being charged with two counts of fourth-degree driving while impaired (DWI), appellant moved to dismiss the charges on the ground that the deputy sheriff unlawfully requested him to give a urine sample after he had provided breath samples for an Intoxilyzer test. His motion was denied. Under the procedure set out in Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 4, appellant acknowledged that the denial of his motion was dispositive, maintained his not guilty plea, and waived his right to a jury trial. The district court found him guilty on stipulated facts. He challenges his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Gunderson v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Young v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017