Legal Opinion

State v. Sterling

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 2010No. A09-418PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge. *

After being charged with two counts of fourth-degree driving while impaired (DWI), appellant moved to dismiss the charges on the ground that the deputy sheriff unlawfully requested him to give a urine sample after he had provided breath samples for an Intoxilyzer test. His motion was denied. Under the procedure set out in Minn. R.Crim. P. 26.01, subd. 4, appellant acknowledged that the denial of his motion was dispositive, maintained his not guilty plea, and waived his right to a jury trial. The district court found him guilty on stipulated facts. He challenges his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Gunderson v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Young v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API