Legal Opinion
Tyler v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 24, 1985No. C6-84-447PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
This is a license revocation proceeding under Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1983), the implied consent law. The driver, Tim A. Tyler, was involved in a serious head-on collision. Because Tyler was intoxicated and because it appeared that the driver of the other car might die, the investigating officer did not give Tyler an implied consent advisory before obtaining Tyler’s consent to a blood test. That test showed that Tyler’s blood alcohol concentration was .14. Subsequently, the commissioner revoked Tyler’s license under Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4, which authorizes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cupp v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. SpeakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State, Department of Public Safety v. WiehleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. SchauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.