Legal Opinion
Drew v. Skeena Lumber Co. Ltd.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 1930No. 27,904PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The action is to recover on an indemnity bond wherein plaintiff was obligee, Skeena Lumber Company, Ltd. obligor, and respondent surety. Findings were in favor of respondent, and plaintiff appeals. The lumber company defaulted.
The important facts are these: A. H. Johnson, the assistant secretary of Skeena Lumber Company, Ltd. a Canada corporation, hereinafter referred to as the lumber company, approached plaintiff for a loan, representing that the lumber company had obtained a conditional approval of the state securities commission to register for sale in this state its $250,000 bond issue,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Billington v. . WagonerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- City of Minneapolis v. Republic Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Cheney v. DunlapNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- First State Bank v. NiklassonNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Phalen Park State Bank v. ReevesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- E. C. Warner Co. v. W. B. Foshay Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Goff v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.