Legal Opinion

Lukasiewicz v. Haddad

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 30, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

24 N.J. Super. 399 (1953)

94 A.2d 504

SIGMUND J. LUKASIEWICZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JAMES H. HADDAD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 19, 1953.

Decided January 30, 1953.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.

Mr. Grover C. Richman argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Horace G. Brown argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The plaintiff has a judgment against the defendant entered in accordance with the verdict of the jury awarding him the sum of $100,000 compensatory damages for the bodily injuries…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Moore v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Bowen v. Healy's, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Gee v. MossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. StanleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Kulodzej v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Massotto v. Public Service Coord. TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Carlucci v. StichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Conklin v. MIELE'S MOTOR TRANSPORTATION, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API