Carlucci v. Stichman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
50 N.J. Super. 96 (1958)
141 A.2d 68
MARY CARLUCCI, DEBORAH CARLUCCI, AN INFANT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
HERMAN T. STICHMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 31, 1958.
Decided May 2, 1958.
Before Judges PRICE, HANEMAN and SCHETTINO.
Mr. James Emory argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys).
Mr. Francis Sorin argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.
Appellant seeks to set aside as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Wytupeck v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Ford v. ReichertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Cabakov v. ThatcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Marchese v. MonacoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Massotto v. Public Service Coord. TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Johnson v. StovekenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958