Legal Opinion

Carlucci v. Stichman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 2, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

50 N.J. Super. 96 (1958)

141 A.2d 68

MARY CARLUCCI, DEBORAH CARLUCCI, AN INFANT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

HERMAN T. STICHMAN, TRUSTEE OF THE HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 31, 1958.

Decided May 2, 1958.

Before Judges PRICE, HANEMAN and SCHETTINO.

Mr. James Emory argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys).

Mr. Francis Sorin argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

Appellant seeks to set aside as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Wytupeck v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Ford v. ReichertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Cabakov v. ThatcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Marchese v. MonacoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Massotto v. Public Service Coord. TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Johnson v. StovekenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API