Legal Opinion
Kulodzej v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 24, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
39 N.J. Super. 268 (1956)
120 A.2d 763
STANESLAW KULODZEJ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 13, 1956.
Decided February 24, 1956.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. James B. Emory argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Emory, Langan & Lamb, attorneys; Mr. Charles W. Broadhurst and Mr. James J. Langan, of counsel and on the brief).
Mr. Aaron B. Weingast argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Joseph A. Pennica, attorney).
The opinion of the court was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. SurplessSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Blackman v. West Jersey & Seashore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Lukasiewicz v. HaddadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Rhodehouse v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
- La Rocca v. EnchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haid v. LoderstedtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Botta v. BrunnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Paxton v. MisiukNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Hayes v. ChaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.