Legal Opinion
United States v. Bramel
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided January 5, 1990No. ACMR 8701207PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND
WERNER, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of forcible sodomy on a child under the age of sixteen years on various occasions during a two-year period, in violation of Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ].1 His approved sentence included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty years and reduction to the grade of Private El.
On 22 February 1989, this court affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence. United…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marshall Kenneth Flowers v. First Hawaiian Bank, Schofield BranchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- McKinney v. JarvisArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. DraytonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HoltU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.