County of San Diego v. Dauer
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney General, George A. Sturtevant, Deputy Attorney General, and T. L. Lewis, District Attorney, for Appellant. Sam Ferry Smith, for C. R. Dauer and Others, Respondents. Oscar A. Trippet, for J. Gruendike, George Hannlis, and Jerry Toles, Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The defendant Dauer was the treasurer of San Diego county from the first Monday in January, 1891, to the second day of January, 1893. This action is on his official bond and was commenced against him and the sureties on said bond on the thirty-first day of December, 1896, to recover the sum of $34,108.87, which it is alleged in the complaint he received during'his term of office and did not deliver to his successor or leave in the treasury, but converted the same to his own use. Among many other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mason v. LuceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. WeinekeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Box Elder County v. HardingUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Nelson v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- State v. HootenLake County Judge's Court · 1959