Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Thomas

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 1930No. Docket No. 6651PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

This case is before us on respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal because of lack of jurisdiction in this court. The action was commenced, tried and determined adversely to' the defendant marshal of the Municipal Court of the city of Los Angeles in the last-named tribunal. From the judgment of that court awarding the plaintiff $510.90, costs and interest, the marshal appealed to the Superior Court, where the judgment of the Municipal Court was affirmed. From such judgment of affirmance the defendant marshal has appealed to this court.

“ Whether an appeal to this court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co. v. Sierra Valleys Ry.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Crawford v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Johnston v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. DarlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Nelson v. DarlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API