Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 17, 2001No. 98C-46239; A107894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

The state appeals an order suppressing evidence. ORS 138.060(3). We affirm.

Defendant was a suspect in a homicide investigation. Two detectives visited defendant’s home for the purposes of arresting him on an unrelated probation violation charge and interviewing him about the homicide. The police transported defendant to the police station to interview him. After the interview, the police seized the clothing and boots that defendant was wearing, because they believed that the items matched a witness’s description of clothing and boots worn by the killer. The police then obtained a search…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Lovaina-BurmudezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. WeemsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API