Legal Opinion
Lam v. American Express Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 23, 2003No. 02 Civ. 4591PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Danny Lam (“Lam”) brings this action for compensatory and punitive damages alleging fraudulent inducement, breach of contract, and federal and state claims for national origin and age discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, New York Executive Law § 296, New York Administrative Code § 8-107 and Labor Law § 198(l-a). Defendant American Express Company (“American Express”) moves for the partial dismissal of Lam’s claims pursuant to Rule 9(b) and Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ.P.”). For the reasons set…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fishoff v. Coty, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- ARI and Co., Inc. v. Regent Intern. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Bear, Stearns Funding, Inc. v. Interface Group-Nevada, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Solutia Inc. v. FMC Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Kortright Capital Partners LP v. Investcorp Inv. Advisers Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.