Legal Opinion

Hausee v. Fiero

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, Albany county. Action by John Hausee against Rachel O. Fiero, Defendant appeals from an order granting leave to issue an execution against her.

1Opinion of the CourtMayham, J.

On the 11th day of August, 1875, the plaintiff recovered a judgment in the supreme court, by default, against Rachel C. Fiero, Bingam F. Decker, and Adaline Decker, on a note purporting to have been made by said Decker, and indorsed by the defendant Fiero. At the time of making and indorsement of the note, and entry of the judgment thereon, the defendant Rachel C. Fiero was a married woman, which fact was'not alleged in the complaint. Ro execution was issued on the judgment within five years after the entry thereof. A motion for leave to issue execution was noticed for a special term to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. . Van SyckelNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Frecking v. . RollandNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Munger v. . ShannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Smith v. . RathbunNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Brady v. . DonnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1847

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garczynski v. RussellNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Rondout National Bank v. ShappeeNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Guiterman v. CoutantCity of New York Municipal Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API