Legal Opinion

Garczynski v. Russell

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from special term, Otsego county. Action by Caroline B. Garczynski against Dorr Bussell and another. From an order made May 27, 1893, setting aside an execution issued on a judgment entered in Otsego county on September 17, 1881, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

On the 17th day of September, 1881, the plaintiff"

recovered a judgment against the defendant Dorr Bussell and another for the sum of $5,772.45. On March 17, 1884, Jeremiah. Wintringham,- as receiver of the Pawners’ Bank, obtained a judgment against the same defendants for about $78,000. Previous to. the entry of these judgments, Dorr Russell was the owner of a farm near Cooperstown. By reason of the giving of certain mortgages thereon, the foreclosure thereof, and sale thereunder, the-title to such farm passed to, and was held by, Lucy G. Russell, who was the wife of Dorr Bussell. In 1891,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Floyd v. ClarkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1880
  2. Hausee v. FieroNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Holland v. . GroteNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Atlas Refining Co. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Rondout National Bank v. ShappeeNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Manhanaim Resort Corp. v. SamplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Burch v. BurchNew York Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API