Brandon Henderson v. City of Los Angeles, Officer Soriano, Officer Munoz, and Doe Officers 1 to 10
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BRANDON HENDERSON, an individual, Case No.: 2:24-cv-10938-MEMF-E 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, [DKT NO. 20] 13 OFFICER SORIANO, OFFICER MUNOZ, and DOE OFFICERS 1 to 10, 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 Before the Court is the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Brandon 19 Henderson. Dkt. No. 20. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Partial Motion 20 for Summary Judgment. 21 / / / 22 / / /…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.