Legal Opinion

Rockingham Co-Operative Farm Bureau, Inc. v. City of Harrisonburg

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 7, 1938PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The plaintiff in error filed its petition under the statute to be relieved of a city license tax which had been assessed against it by the Commissioner of Revenue for the city of Harrisonburg. The tax, computed to be $1,302.05, was imposed for the year 1937.

The case was heard by the circuit court and the petition for relief was denied.

The plaintiff in error, a corporation, has been since its organization conducting a business ostensibly as authorized by the Virginia Co-Operative Marketing Act, Code, section 1265, subsections 1-36. It has had its principal office and place of business in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gates & Son Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  2. Standard Ice Co. v. Lynchburg Diamond Ice FactorySupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. National Mechanics Bank v. Schmelz National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  4. Chesapeake Ferry Co. v. Hampton Roads Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Conyers v. MARTIAL ARTS WORLD OF RICHMONDSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  2. Martin v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Gough v. ShanerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  4. Oraee v. BreedingSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  5. Wood Ex Rel. Wood v. Henry County Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API