Legal Opinion

Oraee v. Breeding

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 4, 2005No. Record 050206PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice CYNTHIA D. KINSER.

In this appeal, we revisit the scope of immunity from civil liability afforded a physician under Code § 8.01-581.18(B) and our decision in Auer v. Miller, 270 Va. 172 , 613 S.E.2d 421 (2005). We conclude that the immunity applies only when a physician fails to review, or take action in response to the receipt of, a report containing the results of a laboratory test or examination conducted "not at the request or with the written authorization of a physician." Code § 8.01-581.18(A). Thus, we will affirm the judgment of the circuit court refusing to grant…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Selected Risks Insurance v. DeanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Halifax Corp. v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Board of County SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  4. Pulliam v. Coastal Emergency Services of Richmond, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  5. Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. GordonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  2. Manu v. GEICO Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  3. Smith v. MountjoySupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  4. Curtis Lee Mason v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  5. Gordon v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API