Legal Opinion

Gates & Son Co. v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 9, 1905PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond, affirming a judgment of the Police Justice of said city, imposing a fine on the plaintiff in error for violating a city ordinance.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The plaintiff in error, a corporation, whose place of business fronts on Fourteenth street in the city of Richmond, was fined by a police justice for the alleged violation of an ordinance of the city in obstructing said street.

The obstruction complained of was occasioned by the use of a movable “gang-plank/5 or “skid/5 a contrivance composed of two parallel pieces of timber about twelve feet long and twelve inches apart, sheathed with iron, and held together by wooden cross-pieces. The skid was extended from the front door of the .storehouse across the sidewalk to delivery wagons in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Sarlls v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Orange & Alexandria Railroad v. City Council of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. American Exchange BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tiller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  2. Sellers v. BlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Ex Parte LernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  4. Walling v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
  5. Price v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API