Legal Opinion
P. Beiersdorf & Co. v. Duke Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 14, 1950No. Civ. 51-45PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOHEY, District Judge.
This is an action for trademark infringement and unfair competition commenced on July 20, 1949. Both plaintiff and defendant are New York corporations. On December 9, 1947, plaintiff’s entire capital stock was vested and seized by the Attorney General of the United States from the former German owners under the Trading with the Enemy Act.
Defendant moves under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a) for a transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Dis-' trict of Connecticut, or, alternatively, for a stay of this action pending determination of an action brought…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Mottolese v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- P. Beiersdorf & Co., Inc. v. McGohey JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Entex Industries, Inc. v. Warner CommunicationsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1980
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Cove Vitamin & Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- P. Beiersdorf & Co., Inc. v. McGohey JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951