Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hertz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1906PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. Kavanagh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vickers

W. F. McLaughlin & Co. recovered a judgment against Q. W. Loverin and George J. L. Janes for $1168.71 and costs of suit, which judgment was affirmed by the Appellate and Supreme Courts. (46 Ill. App. 373; 161 Ill. 417.) An execution was issued on this judgment and delivered to the sheriff, who levied the same on the interest of George J. L. Janes in certain goods, and Ernest H: Janes thereupon replevied the goods as belonging to him individually, and gave bond in- the penal sum of $40,000, being double the value of the property as sworn to by him in the replevin affidavit. The appellants were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. CarrollIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Loverin v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Atwater v. American Exchange Nat. BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Barrett v. HinckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Sokel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Garvey v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Romine v. City of WatsekaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  3. Morrison v. Cottonwood Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Forest Preserve District v. BarchardIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. The People v. ClarkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API