Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Hinckley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1888PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hom Josbph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

.Mr. Justice Mulkey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

"Watson S. Hinckley, claiming to be the owner in fee of the . "land in controversy, on the 26th day of February, 1885, brought •an action of ejectment, in the Superior Court of Cook county, .against the appellants, George D. Barrett, Adalina S. Barrett, "William H. Whitehead, and others, to recover the possession, thereof. There was a trial of the cause before the court, without a jury, resulting in a finding and judgment for the plaintiff,, and the defendants appealed.

The evidence tends to show the following state of facts: In 1870 Thomas…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Trustees of Union College v. WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Jackson ex dem. Norton v. WillardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Wilson v. TroupCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1823
  4. Jackson ex dem. Curtis v. BronsonNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  5. Carroll v. BallanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lightcap v. BradleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Furst v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. McFall v. KirkpatrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Wabash Eastern Railway Co. v. Commissioners of East Lake Fork Special Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Adams v. ShirkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API