State v. De Kalb County Exchange, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
There is but one question of consequence in this case and that is whether a mutual farming or trucking cooperative association, organized without capital stock, is amenable to the share of stock tax provisions of § 25, Title 51, Code of 1940.
The answer is no. The appellee cooperative was organized pursuant to the provisions of Title 2 of the Code, authorizing such a corporation without capital stock, and the statute nor its charter can be subverted so as to make it a stock company.
The Commissioner of Revenue made a purported assessment for taxation on certain reserve funds of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Security State Bank v. BreenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Judy v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Wells v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Person & Riegel Co. v. LippsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Chicago Union Traction Co. v. State Board of EqualizationU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illnois · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones Valley Finance Co. v. TennilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
- Fuqua v. Spry Burial Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Smith v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Jones Valley Finance Co. v. TennilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
- Van Wert County Farm Bureau Co-operative Ass'n., Inc. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1963