Legal Opinion

State v. De Kalb County Exchange, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 19, 1950No. 3 Div. 518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

There is but one question of consequence in this case and that is whether a mutual farming or trucking cooperative association, organized without capital stock, is amenable to the share of stock tax provisions of § 25, Title 51, Code of 1940.

The answer is no. The appellee cooperative was organized pursuant to the provisions of Title 2 of the Code, authorizing such a corporation without capital stock, and the statute nor its charter can be subverted so as to make it a stock company.

The Commissioner of Revenue made a purported assessment for taxation on certain reserve funds of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Security State Bank v. BreenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Judy v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Wells v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Person & Riegel Co. v. LippsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. State Board of EqualizationU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Illnois · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones Valley Finance Co. v. TennilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Fuqua v. Spry Burial Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Smith v. BurtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Jones Valley Finance Co. v. TennilleAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Van Wert County Farm Bureau Co-operative Ass'n., Inc. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API