Legal Opinion

Person & Riegel Co. v. Lipps

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1907No. Appeal No. 160PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal No. 160, Jan. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 27, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Person & Riegel Co. v. E. J. Lipps. Assumpsit for breach of contract to purchase stock of a corporation.

Read the full summary

Appeal No. 160, Jan. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 27, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Person & Riegel Co. v. E. J. Lipps. Assumpsit for breach of contract to purchase stock of a corporation. Schuyler, P. J., charged in part as follows: [The first question is, did the defendant enter into the contract upon which is based this action? Now, as to what that contract is alleged to be I find it stated so clearly in the statement of claim in this case in paragraphs 2 and 3 that I will adopt the language used in those paragraphs rather than…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

The first contention of the appellant is that the agreement declared upon is ambiguous, indefinite and uncertain and, therefore, not a binding contract. The plaintiff’s statement sets forth that in the year 1900^ and for a number of years previous thereto, it was engaged in the dry goods business in the borough of Bethlehem ; that during the month of October, 1899, the defendant called upon M. J. Person, its manager, and stated that he was interested in a store property located in the city of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, which had' been occupied for years as a dry goods…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reeves v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Titus v. Poland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. John W. Cooney Co. v. Arlington Hotel Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1917
  4. Sikorski v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Mastel v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API