Legal Opinion

Smith v. Burton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 12, 1968No. 7 Div. 710PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Complainants appeal from a decree declaring that the shareholders of the stock of Ampco, Incorporated, an Alabama corporation herein referred to as Ampco, are liable for the payment of ad valorem taxes on their respective shares, for the tax year 1963, assessed as provided by Title 51, § 25 et seq., Code 1940.

The complainants are four individual persons and the corporation, Ampco. Three of the individual complainants own all the shares of Ampco. The fourth individual complainant is a director, but not a shareholder, of Ampco.

*393The named respondent is the Tax Collector of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Corry v. Mayor and Council of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Nashville Trust Co. v. CleageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. James Clark Distilling Co. v. Mayor of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Corry v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  5. State v. De Kalb County Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Amerada Hess CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. State v. Amerada Hess CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API