United States v. Scheffer
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentCrawford, Judge
We have held that “[t]he defendant has the right to present legally and logically relevant evidence at trial.” United States v. Woolheater, 40 MJ 170, 173 (CMA 1994). But as all the Judges of this Court agreed in Wool-heater, this is “not [an] absolute” right, id.; see also Montana v. Egelhoff, — U.S. —, —, —, 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017, 2026, 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996); and may yield to valid “policy considerations,” 40 MJ at 173; id.; United States v. Bins, 43 MJ 79, 84 (1995) (citing Woolheater, 40 MJ at 173); United States v. Schaible, 11 USCMA 107, 111, 28 CMR 331, 335 (1960).
None of the cases…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.