Legal Opinion

Burris v. Matson Nav. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 21, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant to dismiss the action on the ground that it is brought in the wrong jurisdiction. Plaintiff, a seaman and a resident of California, sues under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained while he was employed as a seaman on defendant’s S/S Honomu. It appears from affidavits annexed to the moving papers that defendant is a California corporation with its principal office in the City of San Francisco, California. .

In opposition to the motion plaintiff asserts that in the past defendant has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Peters v. Detroit & Cleveland Nav. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1927
  5. Summerall v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dextel Terrebonne v. K-Sea Transportation Corp., K-Sea Operating Partnership Lp, as Successor in Interest to K-Sea Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. The Pure Oil Company v. Pascual SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Bagner v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Bounds v. Streckfus Steamers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
  5. Ebanks v. Grace Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API