Legal Opinion
Bagner v. Blidberg Rothchild Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 7, 1949No. Civ. 8813PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGRANERY, District ujdge.
This case arises as an action by a merchant seaman to recover damages for personal injuries under the Jones Act, 41 Stat. 1007, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688. The defendant employer is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal office located in New York City. The defendant in its answer averred that it is not a “resident” in this district, although it was admitted of record at the argument that the defendant was doing business in this district for the purposes of this suit. On the ground that this action violates the venue provisions of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thomas F. Drabik v. Honorable Thomas F. Murphy, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc. v. SiposDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Southern Paperboard Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- The Pure Oil Company v. Pascual SuarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Phillips v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.