Legal Opinion
People v. Brooks
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*408OPINION OF THE COURT
Cassandra M. Mullen, J.
Procedural Background
On February 1, 2008, this court concluded a hearing to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that respondent, Derrick Brooks, is a sex offender requiring civil management pursuant to article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law. (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.06 [g].) A sex offender requiring civil management is a detained sex offender who suffers from a mental abnormality. (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 [q].)
If respondent is found to be a sex offender requiring civil management, it is suggested that further findings should be made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Gilbert, Segall and Young v. Bank of MontrealDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- People v. BanderaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- State v. O.V.New York Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Steven L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- State v. RosadoNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. P.H.New York Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Enrique T.New York Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010