Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Uhl
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 14, 2014No. 13CA010441PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Taylor v. Uhl,
2014-Ohio-3090.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) SCOTT TAYLOR C.A. No. 13CA010441 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE BRAD UHL LORAIN MUNICIPAL COURT DIANE SLOAN COUNTY OF LORAIN, OHIO REBECCA LOVING CASE No. CVF1101607 Appellees DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: July 14, 2014 MOORE, Judge. {¶1} Plaintiff, Scott Taylor, appeals the ruling of the Lorain Municipal Court. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. {¶2}…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Turner v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carpenter v. New Age Logistics, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Fowler v. FimianiOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Petroskey v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 2018