Legal Opinion

Petroskey v. Martin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2018No. 17CA011098PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLAHAN, Judge.

{¶ 1} David and Jasmine Petroskey appeal from a judgment of the Lorain County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment to Thomas and Dee Martin. This Court affirms.

I

{¶ 2} In August 2013, David Petroskey, as buyer, and Dee Martin, as seller, entered into a purchase agreement for 5555 Laura Lane in Lorain ("the Home"). Jasmine Petroskey is David Petroskey's wife, and Dr. Thomas Martin is Dee Martin's husband. Prior to the sale, the Home had been titled solely in Dee Martin's name. The record does not reflect how the Petroskeys titled the Home.

{¶ 3} In April 2013, Mrs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Layman v. BinnsOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mobley v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Herhold v. Smith Land Co., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API