Legal Opinion
Methodist Hospital v. State Insurance Fund
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1985PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
The transfer of $190 million from the State Insurance Fund to the general fund of the State does not violate the *372Federal or State Constitution. The order of the Appellate Division should, therefore, be affirmed, without costs.
I
The purpose of the present action is to obtain judgment (1) declaring unconstitutional section 92 (2) of chapter 55 of the Laws of 1982, which directed the State Insurance Fund (SIF) to transfer to the State’s general fund $190 million by March 1, 1983, and (2) requiring the return of that sum plus interest from March 1, 1983 to the SIF. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Uhlman v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- American Insurance Ass'n v. ChuNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rhine v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Cardinal v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Schulz v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Alliance of American Insurers v. ChuNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.