Legal Opinion
United States v. Ernest Catchings
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 15, 2013No. 11-6303, 11-6305PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Relevant conduct under United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) § 1B1.3 must be criminal conduct. If not, such conduct is not relevant for the purpose of calculating a defendant’s Guidelines range. In this appeal, we consider whether the district court included non-criminal conduct as relevant conduct when it sentenced defendant-appellant, Ernest Catchings.
Catchings pleaded guilty to one count of identity theft. In essence, Catchings fraudulently opened personal credit-card accounts using his former clients’ personal information without their…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Alan Louis BasharaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gregory Angelo SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Troy HockenberryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Rodney HenryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Nabila MahbubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Adam VanceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Lee JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.