Legal Opinion
Harmar Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 21, 1991No. 90-3259PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge.
Harmar Coal Company (Harmar) and Old Republic Insurance Company (Old.Republic), Harmar’s insurer against liability for federal black lung benefits, petition for review of an order of the Benefits Review Board (Board). The Board affirmed the Department of Labor’s (Department’s) determination that Joseph Rostís (Rostís) was entitled to black lung benefits and that Harmar and Old Republic were responsible for paying those benefits to Rostís. Har-mar and Old Republic conceded almost at the outset of this case that they would be liable if any benefits…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mullins Coal Co. of Va. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Big Horn Coal Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, John J. Madia, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Harmar Coal Company v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991