Mueller v. Sigmond
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
The trial court granted respondent Lois Marie Mueller’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of her blood alcohol concentration at the time of a car collision. The jury found that appellant Kari Martha Sig-mond’s failure to yield at a stop sign caused the accident. The jury awarded damages. Sigmond appeals exclusion of the blood alcohol concentration evidence, denial of a curative instruction during closing argument, an award of future damages, and denial of a new trial. We affirm.
FACTS
At 9:30 p.m. on September 22, 1988, Mueller was driving north on Highway No. 95 in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Pietrzak v. EggenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Nhep v. RoisenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- McPherson v. BuegeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. PelawaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Poston v. ColestockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.