Legal Opinion
Poston v. Colestock
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 5, 1995No. C9-95-1152PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
A personal injury plaintiff challenges the curative instruction given in response to her attorney’s comments in closing arguments. Because the district court acted within its discretion, we affirm.
FACTS
John Colestock hit Molly Poston’s car in February 1992. Poston saw a chiropractor for neck and back pains and headaches the day after the accident, and in August 1992 he determined Poston had regained her pre-accident condition. In September 1992 Po-ston first complained of jaw difficulties to her dentist, and later consulted several dental specialists.
Because Colestock…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harlow v. ChinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Halla Nursery, Inc. v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fialkow v. DeVoe Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BreauxCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Jean A. Swanson v. Summit Orthopedics, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016